Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Poker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete all. –Llama mantalkcontribs 04:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Portal:Poker
Unfinished, unmaintained portal. (Note that I'm an active member of WikiProject Poker, and this portal was not created by and is not maintained by that project. The project has no problem with having such a portal if it is active, but this is not.) —Doug Bell talk 21:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Also included in this nomination are the following subpages:
 * Portal:Poker/Categories
 * Portal:Poker/Did you know
 * Portal:Poker/Intro
 * Portal:Poker/Literature
 * Portal:Poker/Poker jargon
 * Portal:Poker/Poker jargon/35 2006
 * Portal:Poker/Poker jargon/36 2006
 * Portal:Poker/Poker jargon/37 2006
 * Portal:Poker/Poker news
 * Portal:Poker/Poker topics
 * Portal:Poker/Quotes
 * Portal:Poker/Quotes/35 2006
 * Portal:Poker/Quotes/36 2006
 * Portal:Poker/Quotes/37 2006
 * Portal:Poker/Related articles
 * Portal:Poker/Selected article
 * Portal:Poker/Selected article/35 2006
 * Portal:Poker/Selected biography
 * Portal:Poker/Selected biography/35 2006
 * Portal:Poker/Selected biography/36 2006
 * Portal:Poker/Selected biography/37 2006
 * Portal:Poker/Selected picture
 * Portal:Poker/Things you can do
 * Portal:Poker/WikiProjects
 * Portal:Poker/box-footer
 * Portal:Poker/box-header
 * Portal:Poker/related articles


 * Delete. Unneeded page with extremely subjective possibles focuses, as well as internal spam risk.  Those things have not happened, I suspect because spammers don't know it exists.  The WikiProject Poker has a fairly well-organized group of articles that this sort of sits off to the side from. 2005 21:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Because theres a Wikiproject about this and the portal is unfinished there is no need for another one. Telly   addict Editor review! 11:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Why doesn't the WikiProject take it over? Tito xd (?!?) 21:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Why would it? Why should it? The bottom line is that it isn't a good idea to have it, but beyond that there is no reason to have it. 2005 01:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all. I've learned that Doug Bell has a good sense of judgment, and he applied it correctly to this case. YechielMan 08:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per informed nom. - WeniWidiWiki 06:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.