Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Prehistory of Antarctica (3rd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Userfy and delete redirect Legacypac (talk) 09:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Prehistory of Antarctica


Like Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Prehistory of Oceania there is no head article on this topic so it can not be an appropriate topic for a portal. Show first that the topic can support an article before building a portal. Twice suggested it would be userfied and worked on, twice that was not done. Look at the arguments and evaluate against where we are today.
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Prehistory of Antarctica
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Prehistory of Antarctica (2nd nomination)

This is also well within the scope of a properly built Portal:Antarctica especially since there is not a lot of human history there. Legacypac (talk) 03:44, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as it doesn't seem to be a "broad subject area" as required, as its topic doesn't even have a mainspace article. Meszzy2  (talk) 10:08, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Userfy: I'll accept userfication. Abyssal (talk) 11:13, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Which you offered on the last two mfds. Legacypac (talk) 11:24, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Then I apologize for forgetting to do so. Abyssal (talk) 13:32, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Userfy per request. - Old portal, 22 subpages, created 2015-08-10 20:46:35 by User:Abyssal. Pldx1 (talk) 16:42, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - As Legacypac says, the lack of a head article is a non-starter. Not a broad subject area.  Previous history does not override the basic negative arguments.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Write the article first. I will !vote Keep on the article.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - This portal has stupid DYKs. I think that this means that robotic portals should not have DYKs at all.  It probably also means that robotic portals should not exist, because their creation results in a false sense of satisfaction by the portal platoon that they have done something.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.