Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Strictly Come Dancing (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:20, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Strictly Come Dancing

 * plus subpages

Old portal that was restarted as a single page in November 2018 by TTH. Prior to the restart that removed all old content and made the subpages redundant, the page looked like this, after TTH had partly automated the page. The current events/news is from 2009/2010 - 6 or so seasons of the show behind, and other components of the page are similarly way out of date. Pretty clear this was a dead single TV show portal, now turned into an automated portal just like the ones we have been mass deleting. See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Strictly Come Dancing where the issue of scope was argued but the response was the page was still under construction. Legacypac (talk) 01:33, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - As noted by nominator, a former heritage portal that has been broken and is not being maintained. Selected Image has a red Lua error.  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Old portal, 31 subpages, created 2008-10-18 11:00:09 by User:Philip Stevens. Provably unmaintained from 11 November 2018 (broken lead image). Portal:Strictly Come Dancing. Pldx1 (talk) 10:32, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. An old-style portal which was unmaintained, and then converted into a useless automated portal which simply duplicates the navbox Template:Strictly Come Dancing in a bloated form.  (Its "Selected article" list is drawn entirely from the navbox).
 * It is also unused by readers. It January–March 2019, it got only 64 pageviews in total, which is less than one per day. That number is so low that it probably consists largely of the background noise of bots, webcrawlers and editors, rather than actual readers.
 * Yet again, a single TV show is simply to narrow a cope, which fails the WP:POG requirement that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers". This narrow topic attracts neither interested readers nor portal maintainers. -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 10:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.