Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Usher

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. T. Canens (talk) 04:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Portal:Usher


Abandoned portal for a minor topic. Seeing Book:Usher (entertainer), there don't appear sufficiently many articles for a portal. The Evil IP address (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I honestly think the portal space is broken, but that's just me. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC) Keep per improvements. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as portals, if designed well and not having a news or current events section, do not need to be regularly maintained. The portal randomly selects from the available articles and images, and allows a person to easily get into the topic, which is the whole purpose of a portal. Portal space is certainly not broken, but there are certainly many people who misunderstand it and treat it as they would anything in mainspace. They are not the same thing and should not be treated as such. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 22:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - things are better.Moxy (talk) 05:19, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.