Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Wikimedia featured content

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 18:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Wikimedia featured content


10 plus years old page pulling in a hodgepodge of random stuff like a big red image error. No one is working on this page and no one is reading it either. 21 page views in 30 days is background bot traffic not humans benefiting from this page. Legacypac (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - As long as we are going to have portals, this one illustrates what a portal can and cannot do and what Wikimedia is and is not doing (perhaps including not maintaining portals). We don't need this one, but we never needed it and it hasn't dragged anyone down a black hole yet.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly not being used or maintained. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete (or convert to a redirect to somewhere). Pages like this just add to the complexity of wp without providing any benefits. Note: there are no significant inlinks to this "portal" from elsewhere in en wp (the links are from lists, talk pages etc). DexDor(talk) 05:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment  - Courtesy ping: portal created 2008-07-25T17:32:59Z by User:CBDunkerson: Portal:Wikimedia featured content. Pldx1 (talk) 11:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * While nice of you, it's pointless. That admin logs in once a year to maintain his access and nothing else. So don't expect him to respond. --Gonnym (talk) 07:09, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are better ways to explore this content.Guilherme Burn (talk) 12:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Abandoned by maintainers, and also unused:
 * Jan–Mar 2019 pageviews: total 59 = 4.6 per week
 * Jan–Mar 2018 pageviews: total 19 = 1.5 per week
 * Jan–Mar 2017 pageviews: total 22 = 1.7 per week
 * Jan–Mar 2016 pageviews: total 15 = 1.2 per week
 * This may have seemed like a good idea a decade ago, but it is now clearly redundant. -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 18:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.