Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart


Individual nomination from Miscellany for deletion/Biography portals. Ping participants

Biographical Portal("per se" a narrow topic), not meets WP:POG. Portal with very low pageviews. Guilherme Burn (talk) 19:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * [responding to ping] I have no opinion on this portal. --Xover (talk) 19:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This micro-portal was created last year and already has no steady maintainers. The creator, Mozart834428196, was indefed in Jan 2019 and last touched the portal a whopping 19 minutes after they created it. It clearly fails WP:POG's requirement that portals should be about subjects broad enough to attract large numbers of maintainers and readers. This portal already has no steady maintainers and it had an abysmal 3 views per day in June and July 2019 (despite the head article Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart having 5465 views per day in the same period). Portals stand or fall on their merits in the now, not what could someday hypothetically happen with them, and this one falls flat. I am strongly against allowing recreation, as all evidence shows that this portal is not wanted by readers or maintainers, and was a spur of the moment creation by a fan of the subject. Newshunter12 (talk) 21:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Narrow topic, with only 6 views per day in January–June 2018.
 * This portal was created in 2018, as part of the mad portal-for-everything phase of expansionism. -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 22:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete because of the lack of a maintainer and repeatedly verified low page views. BHG and NH12 used different baselines and got different very low pageviews.  In the previous canceled MFD, I reported 8 daily pageviews in Jan-Feb 19, and 7789 for the article.  That is, the low pageviews are very consistent over multiple baselines.  This is not purely a biographical portal.  It has approximately 100 articles via internally embedded lists, musical works, about his a far better design than partially forked subpages.  However, it doesn't have enough readers, and it doesn't have a maintainer.  So we have already tried a better design.  Just delete it. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete people should not have a portal.Catfurball (talk) 16:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.