Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Yangtze

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 10:54, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Yangtze


A very poor version of Yangtze with some weird unrelated content thrown in like Chinese giant salamander. Automated junk by another member of the junk portal crew. Provides no navigation benefit or help, while the article is filled with contextual links and otyer useful navigation aids. Legacypac (talk) 05:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - A portal for a river? Really?? This one doesn't even come with a navbox, it's just a separate page with part of the main article's lead - why would someone make this?? Meszzy2  (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete  - Automated portal,  0 subpages, created 2018-11-26 18:49:08, to be deleted: Portal:Yangtze. Pldx1 (talk) 13:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - The Yangtze is one of the longest rivers in the world. This is not the only river portal.  We already looked at Portal:Nile.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:02, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - We have already established (with its African cousin) that even rivers do not necessarily rate portals. Another automated portal by the portal platoon.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:05, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.