Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Young Wizards

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 10:35, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Young Wizards


A too limited topic to sustain a portal. Only 15 articles. Less than 1 pageview per day. Fram (talk) 11:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sigh. I was hoping for more interest.-- Auric   talk  18:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete scope too limited. Legacypac (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete – Does not meet the minimum of around 20 articles as denoted at WP:POG. As per the nomination, Category:Young Wizards only has 15 articles. North America1000 18:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - I will go along with an editor who usually defends portals and will agree that this one needs deleting. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:54, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. An automated portal only worth of an automated deletion. Pldx1 (talk) 11:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. <20 articles. — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 22:29, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.