Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Zelda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was that it be deleted. Warofdreams talk 11:01, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Portal:Zelda
Pointless and un-maintained/incomplete Portal, that appears to be vandalism (refer first image). Delete. Cyberjunkie | Talk 05:37, 28 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is the right time to enforce good standards relating to portals. We won't need one million portals! I hope creators understand the reason of being of a portal. Indeed, what Carmen Boullosa got to do with this portal? -- Svest 11:50, 28 September 2005 (UTC) Wiki me up&#153;
 * delete I thought portals were supposed to be for broad subject areas? This sure doesn't look like it fits that criteria. --Rschen7754 04:30, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless radically improved in the next few days - I'll check back before this MfD is over. -- BD2412 talk 17:28, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless it is really fixed within the next few days. Tito xd 00:55, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per BD2412. --Cel e stianpower hablamé 11:54, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: seems to have withered on the vine. —Phil | Talk 08:50, 6 October 2005 (UTC)