Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Rainbow unicorn's talk pages

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Moved. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Rainbow unicorn's talk pages


please delete main page and archive wont be editing after this is closed thank you Rainbow unicorn (talk) 20:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I have deleted the archive User talk:Rainbow unicorn/Archive 1 under speedy delete reason WP:CSD, but we do not delete talk pages here (User talk:Rainbow unicorn) without a stronger reason. If all you want to do is to go inactive, you can blank your talk page. The normal practice is to keep talk pages. It's reasons such as attack, 100% advertising or copyright violation that your talk page could be deleted, but I don't see that here.  Instead I see DYK  (audited content) success! Another idea is to replace the content with , which will give the idea that you will not be around. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * A guideline on what you want to do is here: Courtesy vanishing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:03, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I now see that would have seen this already, so Retiring is my next suggestion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:CVUT i put a request at bureaucrats noticeboard but no response after 20 hours so i removed that also says it can be deleted here theres no good reason to keep it i would like it deleted please
 * However there is a good reason to keep, so I am voting Keep. But let us see if anyone else has an opinion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep There doesn't appear to be a good reason to delete the talk pages (or other content supplied by this user in good faith). However, any connection between this account name and the old one could probably be revdel'd or oversighted to allow the user to disappear completely. clpo13(talk) 23:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.