Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete as obvious mistake, aka user test.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  13:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion
On a whim, I decided to search for recursive MfDs. I've placed a speedy-delete tag on one (Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:*playboi53*), but there are two here which don't seem to fit any of the CSDs except possibly G6. They seem to be comments made in relation to deletions, but they're out of context, and the page names are just silly. (This is a triply-recursive MfD I suppose, as it would have 4 MfDs in the title if I'd done it one at a time, but I'm doing it like this to avoid clogging up the recursive-MfD list even more.) --ais523 14:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Edxx3
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheWickedTheory
 * delete. why recurse? ~Crazytales (Talk) 01:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.