Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Stale user autobiographies

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete all except User:Edoeringer/Eric Doeringer. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Stale user autobiographies
The user subpages listed below are all probable autobiographies, based on the correlation of the username to the subject name. Each was created using the Article Wizard in October 2009 and then abandoned. In most cases no attempt has been made to create mainspace articles on these subjects (except two that were speedy deleted). Autobiography or not, the subjects are all living people who do not appear to meet the standards for inclusion as article subjects, so the drafts are unlikely to be useful. The only edits for these users are related to these subjects, in some cases just a single edit to create the draft page, and none of them have edited since 2009.


 * User:Adamoc86/adamoconnor
 * User:Bergercraig/CraigBerger
 * User:Brittany dangelo/Brittany D'Angelo
 * User:Dannydigby/Daniel Robert Digby
 * User:Dweinbre/William Drew Weinbrenner
 * User:Edoeringer/Eric Doeringer
 * User:Emily 'Bambi' Rose/Emily-Rose Saxon
 * User:KarlAndersoncomposer/Karl Anderson Composer (1974-)
 * User:Meredithangus/Meredith Angus
 * User:Nreid1980/Nik Reid
 * User:Patriciopearl08/Ruth Pearl Patricio
 * User:Paulcw/Paul connor-woodley

I believe all of these should be deleted per WP:FAKEARTICLE. I have nominated them together because they all share similar circumstances, but if relevant differences are identified in one or more pages, I can strike those and nominate them separately. --RL0919 (talk) 03:37, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I haven't checked them all, but they seem to be promotional, consisting of more external links than useful content. Support trusting RL0919's judgment that deletion is appropriate.  In the unlikely event of future interest in building a WP:BIO compliant article, the page can be undeleted.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Abandoned WP:STALEDRAFTs and WP:FAKEARTICLEs with BLP considerations whose creators have not edited since 2009. MER-C 05:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all. I spot checked three and they'd all be speedy-deleted in main space. Without any hint of notability, there's no way they could be improved enough.   Will Beback    talk    08:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Move User:Edoeringer/Eric Doeringer to Eric Doeringer per my rewrite. Delete the rest per WP:FAKEARTICLE and per the fact that I have been unable to find any references to establish their notability per WP:BIO. Cunard (talk) 09:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Per the rewrite, I agree with keeping the Doeringer page. Since others have already commented to delete, I won't de-tag it, but the original reasons for deletion no longer apply. --RL0919 (talk) 16:38, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.