Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Subpages of User:Dkpintar

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. Note that the pages listed are NOT the ones nominated. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Some subpages of User:Dkpintar
Relisted due to addition of large numbers of pages. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 18:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC) This nomination includes all pages listed on Special:PrefixIndex/User:Dkpintar/, with the following exceptions:


 * User:Dkpintar/sandbox CN
 * User:Dkpintar/sandbox Heathrow
 * User:Dkpintar/sandbox Heathrow Svcs
 * User:Dkpintar/sandbox North London Lines
 * User:Dkpintar/sandbox straight track
 * User:Dkpintar/sandbox single branches
 * User:Dkpintar/sandbox CH
 * User:Dkpintar/sandbox East London Line
 * User:Dkpintar/sandbox Northern (City) Line

Quite a few of these are hoaxes, anyone who is familiar with the NYC subway system and its history knows that many of these services and extensions have never existed. It seems that this user wants to make WP diagrams for "fantasy maps" of his vision of the system's future. User has 85% userspace edits. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 18:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete the whole bunch. Wikipedia is not a free web host. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 00:40, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete One edit out of close to 1000 is to articlespace? Whatever the user is here for, it's surely not to build an encyclopedia. VictorianMutant (talk) 01:28, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * These will need to be deleted at some point, although I wish the 6 train went as far as Brooklyn. However, I don't see any evidence that anyone has tried to explain to this user why the pages and templates are problematic, before nominating for mass-deletion. A polite request that the user move this content off-wiki should probably precede any deletions. (My apologies to the nominator and others if there has been such discussion and I've missed it.) Newyorkbrad (talk) 04:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Author notified, nomination expanded. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 18:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Cunard (talk) 04:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NOTWEBHOST. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 10:21, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * '''So why am I allowed to keep the UK-based maps? If you look closely, some of them contain "fantasy" ideas . . . . The London UnderGround line "CH" does no even exist!!!  So why not let me keep the NYC lines until they are finished?  I object to the word "hoaxes".  Dkpintar (talk) 11:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.