Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Abercrombie & Fitch/to do

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Abercrombie & Fitch/to do

 * – (View MfD)

This has not been updated since 2010 and most of the to-do sections have been done. JayJayWhat did I do? 02:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Question - Since the purpose of a talk page is to improve the article, can this be moved to a talk page archive rather than deleted? Robert McClenon (talk) 16:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Either archive, or do nothing.  Do not delete as it was a resource for the current article.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Leaving out-of-date to-do lists behind is worse than useless. Nigej (talk) 18:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.