Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Adelaide / Churchill, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan/to do




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  DELETE. Such things should be posted in one of three places: 1) on the article's main talk page -- not in a subpage; 2) on a WikiProject page/subpage out of article and article talk space; or 3) in userspace. Orphan subpages of lists that contain something useful should be merged into the main article talk page or moved to a WikiProject; otherwise, should they be devoid of anything valuable, they can be speedy deleted as A3 (no content) or G6 (housekeeping) and need not be brought here. NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 02:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Adelaide / Churchill, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan/to do
Delete - Misnamed subpage, unused (nothing links there except for a WP:DBR subpage and now this discussion). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly in wrong place and very dated. SPhilbrick  T  19:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I have never seen a talk page deleted before or up for discussion, this is quite unique. There have been comments that if a page is rated, the editor should suggest what should or could be done to improve the article.  I do not see that the suggestions depart from the  talk page guidelines.  If you feel like a to do list is something that you find that you must delete go ahead, I have more important things to do, like adding those self same to do items to articles.  Sometimes, a new editor likes to have ideas of how to contribute to an article. Sometimes on wikipedia a to do list may appear dated, it does not mean that it is not useful.  What would be the right place if this is the "wrong place"? Have fun with your miscellany for deletion discussion.  Sounds like you should find something better to do.SriMesh |  talk  23:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment actually if one clicks on the link which takes it to the nested talk page, this to do list links to Adelaide, Australia, and not Adelaide Saskatoon, Adelaide Australia is using a different to do list. SriMesh |  talk  23:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.