Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Alex Day

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was WP:IAR redirect so that the content of the page can still be easily accessed if it's needed to discuss Alex Day's notability. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Alex Day


... Talk:Alex Day

A talk page of an article which has been deleted. Delete per WP:CSD.


 * Speedy deletion is not appropriate; I have a horrible feeling that Alex Day enthusiasts are still planning on writing an article about him that demonstrates his notability. To assist my efforts (and anyone else's efforts) in either aiding, discouraging, or at least commenting on such work, this talk page is a useful resource. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That said, I would have no problem with the page being moved to my userspace, where it could hopefully serve the same purpose. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:05, 21 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I want Alex Day to have an article, and I do think he is notable, but it is currently protected as a deleted page. The page Alex Day has been the subject of edit warring about whether it should be deleted or kept. Therefore it doesn't look like it will be unprotected anytime soon. Nominal (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. This talk page has been put up for deletion. There is a reason I have put it up for deletion: it is a talk page of a deleted article. The page Alex Day has been the subject of edit warring about whether it should be deleted or kept. That is the reason that is currently protected as a deleted page. Therefore it doesn't look like it will be unprotected anytime soon. There is a policy which states that talk pages with no corresponding subject page should be deleted. Although the policy states that deletion discussions not logged anywhere else shouldn't be deleted, the deletion discussion can be seen at Articles for deletion/Alex Day or Articles for deletion/Nerimon. If you disgree with deleting the talk page then please state why on this page. I have already requested admin help to delete the talk page. Thankyou. Nominal (talk) 14:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. See also: []. —  Kudu ~I/O~ 15:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep-Alex Day has not been deleted. (Although the use of red link above to make it look as though it had is cute.) It has been changed into a redirect and protected. Not the same thing. There's no policy against redirects having talk pages.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete-This is a talk page of Alex Day, not Alexander Day. The article Alex Day is currently a redirect to Alexander Day. People looking at Talk:Alex Day will get confused as there is a talk page for Alex Day (YouTuber) when there is no article for Alex Day (YouTuber). Talk:Alex Day contains discussions about Alex Day (YouTuber) even though the project page is a redirect to Alexander Day (18th century conman). This will be very confusing for people unfamiliar with both of these people. I suggest either delete the talk page, delete the redirect and talk page, or restore the article and keep the talk page. I have made some improvements to User:Half price/Alex Day. Nominal (talk) 20:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * First off, please don't preface every comment you make with a bolded delete. It makes it harder to follow the track of the discussion. Now then, I'm perfectly aware what page the talk page is for. Having a record of previous discussion related to a topic is useful, especially if there is an effort underway to create a new article on the subject. A redirect IS a valid type of page, and there is no policy I know of that forbids them from having talk pages. If you can point out such a policy, by all means, do so.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: If deleted, it seems the content needs to be archived because it contains continued discussion of whether we should have an article on Alex Day.--Milowent • talkblp-r 10:56, 30 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.