Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Bidaoui

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Bidaoui


Per Template:WikiProject Disambiguation, the template should not be used solely to create talk pages that otherwise have no content. MrClog (talk) 17:47, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - What is the point to deleting an empty talk page? Once the talk page exists, leave it there.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:08, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see the problem.  I think I sense someone has an issue with someone else creating talk pages with WikiProject templates?  Is this a Pagecountitis concern?  I think that there is a problem with WikiProject banner spamming, and that there should be a rule that WikiProject banner posters must be a member of the WikiProject, responsible and accountable within the WikiProject.  I note that User:Micheledisaveriosp is not listed at WikiProject_Disambiguation, why not?  In any case, MfD is not a forum for developing or repealing policy.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep because we're probably going to end up putting old mfd there anyways. I get the concern, but that really should have been a thing you typed out to the user who created the talk page. Why? Because now we have Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Bidaoui which now has more content and discussion than Talk:Bidaoui. What I mean to say is: if it isn't worth creating the page, then it's certainly not worth deleting. Therefore this conversation is a pointless waste of time. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 06:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Discussion Hi. I've given a shor answer directly on my discussion page, when the present one wasn't still opened. I don'think it is useful a discussion on a disambiguation merely consisting of three links. In my opinion, you can delete it at all. I have no Articlecountitis, given that I am engaged both in disambiguation/surname pages and in translations from en to it.Wikipedia. And also, concerning disambiguations, I made many contributions each one of some thousands byte, not uniquely disambiguations of ten or more linked articles: it simply depends on the number of existing pages on en.wikipedia. While writing a disambiguation page, I am used to control all the existing articles, extracted with template:intitle.Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 06:43, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.