Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Bisexuality/to do

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. Untranscluding the page seems like an acceptable compromise for most everyone. ‑Scottywong | gossip _ 18:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Bisexuality/to do


Basically the same list since 2007. The article has significantly improved since then. It spends a reasonable length on history and animals. There are only 2 CN tags, not worth mentioning in a to-do list. The peer review must be at least as old. -Crossroads- (talk) 16:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Talk pages are not deleted but archived, and an unused to-do list is already essentially an archive. Tag it if necessary.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:59, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, subpage is in the wrong place. To-do's (and their talkpages) belong in the project space, not the article space. Except there is no WikiProject Bisexuality. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not everything that has ever existed (especially if created in error) needs to be kept as an archive. DexDor(talk) 16:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep and archive. Talk page header to do lists and similar are talk page history. Talk pages get archived when done. Don’t use MfD to remove a talk page header, just un-transclude and mark as archived, posting a note to the current talk page.
 * Keep. To do lists for articles are allowed and somewhat common (see Category:Wikipedia pages with to-do lists). The list can be blanked and/or untranscluded if it is no longer needed. --RL0919 (talk) 20:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I am honestly surprised by all the keep !votes. Let me emphasize, this to do list has hardly changed in 12 years. The article has drastically improved and it is inapplicable now, I checked. There has been active discussion on the talk page, but no one has showed up here to say it is still needed. I don't know how to archive this without leaving a useless empty/duplicate page. Frankly this out of date junk is not worth the effort to archive, nor even to discuss. -Crossroads- (talk) 20:15, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I think you may be misunderstanding what "keep" means in this case. I don't believe anyone is saying that a "to do" list must continued to be used for the article. (Certainly I'm not saying that.) Rather, the way to stop using it is to take it off the main Talk page and blank it or flag it as historical (see Template:Historical), instead of having it deleted. --RL0919 (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I get that I can untransclude it, and then blank or flag it historical. But a blank page still uselessly exists. Also, wouldn't a blank or marked historical page still categorize the main talk page under 'pages with to do lists'? Not a big deal, but that's also why I thought this would be a uncontroversial deletion. -Crossroads- (talk) 00:11, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.