Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Bose (company)/List of Bose product sightings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  10:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Bose (company)/List of Bose product sightings
A list of Bose product placement trivia. Previously prod'ed; original page author removed prod tag and moved the page from main space to a talk space subpage. This does not appear to serve any conceivable purpose in building an encyclopedia. &mdash;ptk✰fgs 04:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep No if you read my talk page you will see that I put this in the wrong place since it was intended to be a talk page item and not an actual article. There is no reason to delete this just like there would be no reason to delete ANY talk page content... Do I have to put this directly in the talk page for this to be satisfactory?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by UKPhoenix79 (talk • contribs).
 * A list of product placement sightings is, in its essence, an indiscriminate collection of information. Wikipedia talk pages are for the purpose of discussing changes to their associated articles. This will not serve any purpose in developing the associated article, or any other article. Thus there is no reason to retain the content, regardless of its location. &mdash;ptk✰fgs 06:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT a blog. Xiner (talk, email) 14:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information, specifically: That something is 100% true does not mean it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This includes talk pages, which are supposed to be used for the improvement of certain articles and discussing changes.  As such, this listing is a violation of Wikipedia policy.  Srose   (talk)  14:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. James086 Talk 06:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. feydey 14:17, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * week keep if this was an article it should be removed, but since this is a talk page it does not seem to matter--64.240.163.221 18:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, it matters quite a bit. Wikipedia is not a free web host, and piling up random factoids on a talk page is an inappropriate use of the system. The purpose of a talk page is for discussing changes to its associated article. Moving a cruft fork to a talk space subpage does not balance its uselessness. If you want to maintain a list of Bose promotional trivia, you'd do best to find some other server to store it on. &mdash;ptk✰fgs 20:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Still a keep since it is related to the article at hand and i have seen many articles that border fan cruft. i see no problem in a talk page doing this since it does no harm. it even seams that some people are willing to cite the sources & shows64.240.163.221 21:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * How is it related to the article? It's vaguely related to Bose? As for the articles you've seen containing fan cruft, you should purge them of the irrelevant content, rather than cite it here as a justification for retaining other cruft. &mdash;ptk✰fgs 08:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * So bose product is not related to bose? Haven't you argued before that Bose puts a lot of product placement into everything out there? -- UKPhoenix79 09:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.