Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:British Rail Class 700/GA1

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Regular close procedures followed. No need to delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk:British Rail Class 700/GA1


Abandoned GA review for over two months and there is unlikely to be any further update or review so unfortunately, I have to nominate this review for deletion as being abandoned. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I should have used PROD but I will still keep the deletion discussion going. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep but mark as closed to preserve the history. I don't see any valid reason to delete this. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 12:53, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * PROD is only for articles. In any case you may now take it that such a deletion would not be uncontroversial. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 12:55, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * However, the review is abandoned. The page should be deleted but can ber recreated by another active reviewer who can review this page. As of now, the article remains unreviewed. Apologies for confusion with PROD. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I understand that the review has been abandoned. It should be marked as such, so that it is clear that no review is in progress, but it should not be deleted. That will serve as a record that the review was started but abandoned. Why do you think it should be delted instead? DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 13:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * After this is deleted, the review will go back into the pool and will be waiting for a different reviewer to review this. The abandoned review serves no purpose apart from it being history which is not worth keeping. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I must disagree, . I will double check the process, but I am fairly sure that the article can be put back into the pool for a GA review without deleting this abandoned review page. Such history has value to the project. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 13:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * According to Good article frequently asked questions, when a review is started in good faith but abandoned, it doesn't need to be deleted. There are instructions under the question about abandoned reviews for setting certain parameters to effectively reset the review. This can be speedy closed if those instructions are followed, I think. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * speedy close I have followed the directions linked above. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.