Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Carey schwartz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk  02:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Carey schwartz
If it were genuine, it would be an easy move to article space. If it were in article space, easy delete as hoax. Need I say more? Confusing Manifestation 14:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Obvious hoax intended to confuse. Xoloz 15:15, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Horseshoes were around long before the date listed in this hoax article.  Rossami (talk) 21:37, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Does not appear intended to fool anyone. Not MfD's business. Septentrionalis 04:50, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment It's an orphaned talk page masquerading as an article - I would think that simply by being an orphaned talk page would make it MfD's business. Confusing Manifestation 11:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. It's not MfD's business, it's CSD's, but as it's already here and hasn't grabbed any speedy delete vots, let's let it run its course. —  xaosflux  Talk  01:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. That would be my fault. Sorry, for some reason I didn't notice G8 in checking whether it met any speedy criteria. Confusing Manifestation 09:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. Meets speedy delete criteria G8. If it isn't speedied, it is clearly a hoax anyway. DarthVad e r 01:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Xoloz and Rossami. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 20:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.