Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Catholic Church/Old history section (June 2011)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 20:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Catholic Church/Old history section (June 2011)

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This archive of the article has been hidden there for 10 years. I do not think this page helps anyone, and I fail to see what purpose it serves as older versions are archived in the article history. One month ago, I asked the WProject Catholicism what to do and pinged the user who created the archive; so, far no one has replied, and I had completely forgotten about this page until right now, which prompted me to MfD this page before I forget again. Veverve (talk) 00:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I have no objection. –Zfish118⋉talk 01:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak keep – it's not exactly hidden; it is linked from Talk:Catholic Church/Archive 51 and Talk:Catholic Church/Archive 53. I agree it would've been much better to use a permalink for this sort of thing, but I also don't think the page under discussion really *needs* to be deleted. Graham 87 02:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * For history, I think I created the page for quick reference during a major revision of the history section, where I was frequently copying individual subsections back into the article (which cannot be easily done from permalinked revisions in the page history). I personally have no further use of it, but have no strong opinion either way. Someone might revise the archive with a permanlink to June 2011 revision if its deleted. –Zfish118⋉talk 03:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - And the purpose for deletion would be ... ? Robert McClenon (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - no need to duplicate article history into separate pages. User:GKFXtalk 21:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.