Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu Students' Center/GA1

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. Nakon 03:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu Students' Center/GA1


This page should either be deleted under G8 or it should be tagged as G8-exempt. I'm asking my fellow Wikipedians to look at the content and incoming links and discuss it. I'm leaning towards a "weak delete" but would favor tagging it as "g8-exempt" rather than doing nothing. As it is, it is occupying space in Database reports/Orphaned talk subpages. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  23:19, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment/disclaimer: I recently added text to WP:CSD.  See WT:CSD.  The previous content of CSD:G8 is here (diff).  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  23:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. A GA review archive should not be deleted, but recorded as part of the GA processes, but this was not a GA reveiw, instead the reviewer nominated the article for deletion, and it was deleted.  So, there was no review, this page is a mere extension of an ordinary artilce talk page.  i see nothing interesting in the incoming links.
 * Should anyone of good standing have any interest in the page for any reason, they should be able to have it userfied, or placed in some appropriate Wikipedia place. I see no reason why anyone would be interested in this non-review review page.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm ambivalent either way. I don't see the point in usifying it other than removing it from some list. If there is a way to attach it to the deletion log (to which it's related), that may best. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:54, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * (I was one of the contributors to the review). --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:55, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.