Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Colonel Sanders/Comments

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete after copying comment to talk page archive. --RL0919 (talk) 15:39, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Colonel Sanders/Comments
There is nothing really worth keeping here, just some vague complaints about sourcing that were fixed a long time ago. This page has been edited exactly once, so obviously it did not work as a place to discuss the article. The edit summary indicates that the only purpose of this page was to explain why it was rated as start class by WikiProject Biography. I don't know if this was standard procedure at some point but it certainly isn't now. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with nom. -- SPhilbrick  T  14:32, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; there's nothing to add. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 16:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment: It was once standard procedure. See Discontinuation of comments subpages. Graham 87 02:11, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I guess we could copy the edit straight into the archives since it is so old and not really relevant anymore. I can't believe I've never come across this before... Beeblebrox (talk) 02:16, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Archive comment and Delete subpage. Hardly anyone used it or even knew it was there, apparently. The only extant piece mentioned at the time of the comment was that The Kentucky Encyclopedia doesn't have inline citations. - Ruodyssey (talk) 02:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Yeah, per above and nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 12:53, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Substitute into the archive then delete. The comment should have been placed on the talk page to begin with.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.