Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Craig Grebeck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was page blanked, but kept. Xoloz 23:59, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Craig_Grebeck
Pointless creation of talk page, for no legitimate purpose. See page and page history for more. WikiPrez 21:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Suggestion Since this is a perfectly good article, I think stardard practice is to blank idiocy from the talk page, but not delete it. I'll go do that right now. Xoloz 22:21, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * leave it or blank it but Keep. Septentrionalis 23:42, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Note:Deletion of this article talk page would be without prejudice for it being used for legitimate discussion of the article, the only affect other than clearing the page (already done) would be to delete it's history. — xaosflux  Talk  23:59, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * OK. Well, this issue seems to have been resolved sensibly.  I agree.  WikiPrez 23:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.