Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Disability classifications of the International Paralympic Committee

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep for now, nomination is premature at best. --RL0919 (talk) 22:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Disability classifications of the International Paralympic Committee


Talk page for merged article. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * comment the article page this is for has not yet been merged, at this point it may or may not be created, but the premise for deletion is not correct. This discussion should take place somewhere, so I do not support delete, but a transfer to talk:1 point player may be the best outcome. But an even better alternative is to create a page for this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:37, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * If the merge is still in progess, then withdrawn as a nomination based on incomplete information. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:21, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks Sfan00 IMG, I have now started a page without prejudice as to merging, but the page can be a summary. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Premature to delete. A merge seems to be in process, but continued discussion is likely to be needed. The current version of the merged page seems to be intended to show that the title proposed on the talk page is the wrong title, in that the page consists largely of one-sentence sections with contents in the form: "Archery classification is not done by the International Paralympic Committee." --Orlady (talk) 05:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep weird nomination; can't see any reason why this talk page should be deleted. Looks like the nom has withdrawn, so maybe this can be closed.  Chzz  ► 09:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep why would you delete the talk page for something that merged somewhere? The content that the talk page discussed would still exist at the merged article, and since this contains the merge discussion, it seems particularly relevant to keep it. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.