Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Fairvote

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep The page at the time of closure is already a redirect, so this closure expresses no opinion on whether the BLARing is justified. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Fairvote

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Appears to be an accidental creation that should be at Talk:FairVote. –Sincerely, A Lime 14:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It looks like you are right, but I don't think this requires a week-long deletion discussion. Why don't you just ask the person who made the comment if they meant to do so at the other page, and if the answer is yes just move it there. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect (as is already done).
 * If someone makes this mistake, so might someone else, and this is good enough to have a redirect. Redirects are cheap. SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep as is, accidental creation, sure, but its still a useful redirect. -Samoht27 (talk) 18:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep after Redirection - The tag R from miscapitalization has been applied to the redirect. This is one of the many uses for redirects.  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep irrespective of redirection. The page does not even need to be redirected. There is some talk history. The nomination is erroneous. Pages such as this never need to be deleted.—Alalch E. 18:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.