Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Improved Military Rifle

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  withdrawn - (WP:WITHDRAWN); "Sorry about that. I meant that the main article should be deleted, not the talk page." No prejudice against listing the respective article at articles for deletion. (non-admin closure) —  Godsy (TALK CONT ) 00:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Improved Military Rifle


This page is advertising literature and has nothing of history or significance on this subject, which is a subsidiary company of Hodgdon Powder. Digitallymade (talk) 12:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not sure what you are asking for here. You tagged an article talk page for deletion. That page should not b deleted unless the article is deleted. If you meant to nominate the article for deletion you need to nominate it using WP:AFD, this is the wrong venue. You will also need a better reason to delete the article. It is not about the company, it is an article about the powders manufactured by the company. - GB fan 12:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that.. I meant that the main article should be deleted, not the talk page. Digitallymade (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Snow close per GB fan. See also the talk page comments.  This is a mess, and if Digitallymade can't even work an AfD filing, they need to think carefully about just how much article tagging they've done in recent days. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.