Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses/Archive 60

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. I'm closing this despite my participation in the discussion due to the timeliness issue brought up by Jeffro77, and because it appears uncontroversial. Please contact me with concerns. --BDD (talk) 21:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses/Archive 60


a good faith attempt to archive but not needed Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

It is needed because the discussion is cumbersome to the page according to the [|Archiving a talk page] guidelines. The discussion is done. I am also no longer pursuing the edit for which the discussion was started. The page has simply devolved into meaningless questions and arguments.


 * That's why we have a bot, it automatically archives threads that are within a set timeframe and size. It also will give others a chance to comment if they choose to. I understand you are trying to operate under good faith in the edit but it's not time for it to be archived yet. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:44, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; I'd probably call it a G6 speedy. The content in question is still active on the talk page, so there's no benefit to the duplication and some possibility for confusion. --BDD (talk) 22:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I also noticed the editor added their own conclusion to the archived copy. I have reverted the change.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - if the decision to either Keep or Delete is not made in a timely fashion, it may cause problems with the archiving bot. This may need to be fixed manually if the archive is deleted after the bot increments.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 13:29, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.