Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Jewish Internet Defense Force/Possible Sources

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Non-admin closure by :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  06:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Jewish Internet Defense Force/Possible Sources
Weird main-space sub-page purporting to list possible sources for Jewish Internet Defense Force, mostly links to non-rs advocacy groups. Hasn't been edited for 2 years, seems pointless. Misarxist (talk) 15:30, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment This is talk not main. This is why talk page sub-pages exist. It may still be worth deleting. 207.81.170.99 (talk) 17:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Follow status of article: Source repository pages are fairly normal in controversial articles, it limits the 'source thrashing' one can other wise experience with long discarded sources being brought up again and again or, on the other hand retain previous discussion regarding how individual sources meet RS etc. They do no harm (that I can tell), are forward looking and honor WP:WIP(in the general case). un☯mi 17:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems fine to me.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 20:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. A potential resource for the article and especially for any editor new to the controveries who wants to get a sense of the sources on both sides of the debate. This is a talk page, and a sub-page at that, not the article itself. Are you saying editors can't even talk about these sources, that we aren't supposed to look at them or be aware of their existence? I'm not buying that at all. –  OhioStandard  (talk) 06:19, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep "Pointless" is an insufficient reason for deletion in itself. Nor is there any rule that all links in userspace must be RS. Collect (talk) 14:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I mean the vast majority of the links aren't reliable sources, also the few reliable sources are in the article, therefore this page no longer serves any purpose. Misarxist (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Creates no harm, is potentially useful, even if it doesn't appear to be used. -- SPhilbrick  T  17:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep although the content might better serve as a subpage of whichever WikiProject is most directly relevant to this topic or perhaps as a stand alone Bibliography of the Jewish Internet Defense Force if such would be a notable topic. John Carter (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.