Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Ketchup on hot dogs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep--Aervanath (talk) 07:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Ketchup on hot dogs

 * Nominator has provided no justification yet!
 * I'm the nominator, and I'm sorry for messing this up. I thought this should probably be deleted because it's a talk page for something which was deleted/merged(unless there's some rule or precedent for keeping "orphaned" talk pages which would apply here). 69.224.37.48 (talk) 17:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - significant discussion over a merged article, the corresponding article is a redirect, but the talk has plenty of content. Potentially this topic could have an article, if it was not a redirect to Hot dog sauce. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not orphaned, 69.224.37.48. This link is blue, notice.  And no deletion has occurred.  This log is empty, notice. Uncle G (talk) 16:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Talk:Hot dog. Stifle (talk) 11:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as the page contains significant discussion about deletion and merging which should be preserved as long as Ketchup on hot dogs is a blue-link. While redirecting to Talk:Hot dog would not delete the discussion (it would still be available in the page history), it would hide it, and I see no advantage to doing so. –Black Falcon (Talk) 20:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.