Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Newark, California/Comments

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Merge CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 10:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Newark, California/Comments


Comments subpages for article space were deprecated in 2009. The comments from this page left in 2007 are no longer relevant to the article and do not need to be kept. Kumioko (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Possibly, erring on the side of caution, these comments subpages, which are near meaningless in isolation, should be copied into the talk page (or archive if archived), where comments should have always gone, and then justifiably speedy delete the Comments subpage under G6. Or redirect the Comments subpage to the talk page (or archive), so no admin needs even be bothered to speedy delete.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Copy to main talk page/archive with attribution using unsigned and then delete per SmokeyJoe. The content was once useful. Keeping the comments page around in any form would defeat the whole purpose of this nomination, because the "assessment summary page" link is activated if the page exists, whether it is a redirect or not. Graham' 87 07:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing worth keeping here. Too much effort to copy and integrate history before delete. --  Ohc  ¡digame!¿que pasa? 04:35, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.