Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Ralph Underwager

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy keep. Based on the rationale, the nomination appears to be directed at the article rather than the talk page. Nominator can re-submit to WP:AFD if desired, or if they really do want the talk page by itself deleted, re-submit here with a better-explained reason. --RL0919 (talk) 23:14, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Ralph Underwager


Not notable Sturunner (talk) 04:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This is a talk page; as long as we have an article on the subject how can you possibly justify deleting the talk page? If you want to afd the article, do so but as long as we have an article I strongly oppose removing this talk page, it goes completely against the wikipedia spirit of openness and transparency. The article may be unnotable but please explain what you mean by the talk page being unnotable while the artilce apparently is notable. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 11:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * This looks like an accident. It appears Sturunner wanted to take the article to AfD and wasn't aware that one has to be on the article rather than the talk page when using Twinkle's "XfD" feature. This should be closed and relisted at AfD. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 12:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.