Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Robinson Road, Hong Kong

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy keep. No reason to delete a talk page over a 14-year-old irrelevant comment. I've binned the comment (no point in archiving) and am boldly closing this as moot. If anyone wishes to reverse this closure as they feel it was improper, please go right ahead. (non-admin closure) ƒirefly  ( t · c ) 12:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Robinson Road, Hong Kong

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

No meaningful content; WP:NOTFORUM Firestar464 (talk) 06:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep; we're generally lenient on old meaningless talk page comments – I see them all the time. Anyway this should definitely not be deleted because the talk page banners are helpful. If anything the comment should just be removed. It's odd to take it to MfD, to say the least. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 06:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep There's no need to delete the entire talk page over a single 14-year-old comment. Just refactor it. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 06:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. No reason to delete. Effectively, this is a request for REVDEL; see the criteria here. Nothing even close. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.