Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Uckfield


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Speedy keep nomination withdrawn. Hut 8.5 17:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Uckfield
Bacchus87 (talk) 12:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Talk page for an article not nominated for deletion?   If you wish to edit the talk page because you feel it is not aimed at improving the article (um -- most is from 2006), then propose edits there, but deletion, as it stands, makes no sense.  Was there a rationale you wish to state? Collect (talk) 14:14, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep unless Bacchus can explain his reason for nominating this. Ironholds (talk) 14:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep I pressed the wrong button and do not wish to delete uckfield, appologies Bacchus87 (talk) 15:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.