Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Wreathgate

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: procedural close (WP:PCLOSE). AfD is the proper venue to seek the deletion of Wreathgate; Talk:Wreathgate was seemingly nominated here at MfD by accident instead. See also Articles for deletion/Wreathgate. (non-admin closure) —  Godsy (TALK CONT ) 09:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * See above. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 09:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Wreathgate


A current highly contentious news story - even the name is not established yet, This has no place in Wikipedia until there are reliable third party sources in respect of the title and the content ---Snowded TALK 08:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not even being described as 'Wreathgate' in the United Kingdom. Very contentious. Not appropriate for an encyclopaedia. Garageland66 (talk) 09:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Why is the nominated for deletion? Sam Sailor 09:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.