Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Adpr

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Template:Adpr


Unused userbox (yes, despite the title, it's a userbox). — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems harmless to be sure. Used by Benc90 if you looked. Cheers. Collect (talk) 15:00, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * uses user adpr, which is very similar to this. Dynamic&#124;cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 22:12, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete actually it's not Collect.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 15:22, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, unused, and essentially a duplicate of user adpr with different coloring. Dynamic&#124;cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 22:12, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirecting to user adpr is another possible solution. Dynamic&#124;cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 22:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Unused userbox, delete Bulwersator (talk) 09:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, should be unused due to the presence of the userbox mentioned by cimanyD. Any idea why it reads "user has has studied", rather than simply "user has studied"?  Nyttend (talk) 04:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with the above that this is currently an unused userbox, but that isn't a reason for deletion.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  11:34, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It's unused because there's another one just like it. Why do we need two userboxes that do and say the same thing?  Nyttend (talk) 13:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.