Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Editnotices/Page/Deleted to make way for page move

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 06:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Template:Editnotices/Page/Deleted to make way for page move

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Associated with RfD: If Deleted to make way for page move is deleted while remains unsalted, Editnotices/Page/Deleted to make way for page move should be deleted per WP:G8. Please also refer to the related discussion User_talk:Sdrqaz#Undeletion_request. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Do nothing until the RfD concludes. I don't have a strong opinion at the moment what should happen after that. Thryduulf (talk) 09:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: At this point this is a hypothetical deletion discussion. However, as I said in the discussion linked by nom, I think this falls within G8's exception for an orphaned dependent page that nonetheless serves a useful purpose. I don't think the exclusive exception would be an editnotice for a salted page; that was just the exception that Andy M. Wang thought of when he boldly added G8's bulletpoint about editnotices. (On a minor note, I now regret suggesting MfD, since TfD is probably the better venue. I had been looking at Template:G8-exempt when I mentioned that. But I am fine with either.) SilverLocust 💬 11:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * As I commented in the RfD, a page mover will never realize the existence of this editnotice before they mistakenly try to move a page here. That's exactly what did here and what  did here. The editnotice is completely useless to prevent this, while a redirect holding up the move may instead work as expected. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Unused is redundant in that description, which exactly consists of non-existent pages and unsalted deleted pages. As for page that is useful to Wikipedia, it's quite difference from one you can simply call it useful by yourself: I can create editnotices of warning for all user talk pages of sockpuppets and claim that they are useful as a reminder for commenters unaware of their sockpuppetry, while it remains uncertain if they are actually useful to Wikipedia. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep even if the page is deleted, the editnotice serves per the RfD discussion, as it will popup on the redlink -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 06:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.