Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Impeach




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was moved to User:UBX/Impeach Obama. @harej 03:30, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Template:Impeach
I have to ask, is this really appropriate? Irbisgreif (talk) 00:22, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, sorry for bringing this to TfD. Irbisgreif (talk) 00:22, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Shouldn't we have removed the "This user wishes Bill Clinton was still in office" and other userboxes with similar sentiments as well? &mdash; $PЯINGεrαgђ  03:55 17 October, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I would say so. Wouldn't you? Irbisgreif (talk) 06:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Move to userspace, as no policy currently dictates its removal. WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid reason. Tan   &#124;   39  15:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Move to the User: namespace. This doesn't belong in the Template: namespace. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:30, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a social club. 76.66.194.183 (talk) 19:57, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Move to userspace, template space is for Wikipedia and article content only.--Otterathome (talk) 18:06, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Move per above. BlazerKnight (talk) 01:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Move to user space or userbox space. (Why was this created as a template in the first place? It's a UBX.) --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Because the current userbox policy sucks. Gigs (talk) 21:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Move for obvious reasons stated above. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:21, 21 October 2009 (UTC) (shaking his head in incredulity at the vitriol of the Right)
 * Move - while not blatantly inappropriate, such things should be limited to the user namespace. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:52, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is definetly a policy about polemic statements here. That has to go. Naluboutes, NaluboutesAeria gloris, Aeria gloris 18:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you point me out to that policy? Tan   &#124;   39  14:21, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as soppy attention-seeking. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► constabulary ─╢ 06:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Move - Per Tan. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 14:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Utterly pointless. Garion96 (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Mind you, there's a lot of pointless UBX's out there. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 19:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know, I wish we could delete all of them. But besides pointless, this one is also is divisive. Which used to be a speedy delete criterion for templates. Too bad it has been removed. Garion96 (talk) 19:15, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.