Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Japanese Sinosceptic

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete all. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Template:Japanese Sinosceptic


I believe this userbox is inappropriate because it says the user has a phobia against Japanese people. I also nominate these similar userbox templates that have been created by the same user:
 * --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep all. The nominator has misunderstood the template - It does not describe phobia against Japanese people. Rather, it expresses the opinion that the user of the box identifies with Japanese identity and that they are sceptical of China. Similar for the other templates. As I wrote in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Sinosceptic, "Sinoscepticism is a valid opinion for one to hold; whether it's a good or bad opinion is beyond TfD's remit. A display of one's (dis-)interests and opinions is allowed on userpages, as with all the other examples in Category:Political user templates." Deryck C. 10:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Negative, divisive.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all - Sinoscepticism, as with any other normative view, is a valid opinion, but it also happens to be an inflammatory and divisive opinion, which makes these userboxes a violation of WP:Userboxes. We are not judging good or bad, we are judging the potential to inflame and divide. A2soup (talk) 15:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this could be reworded. SwisterTwister   talk  07:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.