Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Page vandalized




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. If someone actually wants this, contact me to have it userfied. Tim Song (talk) 17:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Template:Page vandalized
Not really suitable content for a userbox. Makes more sense to undo the vandalism rather than just to add a userbox onto a page. WOSlinker (talk) 23:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm pretty sure it's intended to be used as humor. ~ N ERDY S CIENCE D UDE  (✉ message • changes) 23:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe it needs Category:Wikipedia humor adding to it then. -- WOSlinker (talk) 23:53, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It's an orphan and there is no conceivable way it could be used in any useful (or even humorous) manner. Johnuniq (talk) 05:09, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Userfy - An orphaned template. It was probably intended to be used as humour; the creator probably thought of a creative way it could be used and either just never ended up using or took it off. I have no problem with moving it to the creator's userspace. --  M e a g h a n ) ≈ 02:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as first preference, userfy as second. Nothing wrong with this. Being an orphan is no concern of mine: someone might want to pick it up in which case it's more likely to be picked up if it is in the template space categorised than sitting in an obscure userspace. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No one has picked this up in over two years. Do you see any use for this? If you (or any of those supporting retention) can find a good reason to keep this template and adopt this template so that it can become useful, I will withdraw my delete. Cunard (talk) 08:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep While I'm not thinking of a good use for this, someone might, and I don't see the harm. -- SPhilbrick  T  16:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete For over two years (since October 2007), this orphaned template has been unused and forgotten. I do not view this as harmless; if editors began placing this template in the mainspace, it would be disruptive. Editors who know how to place a template on a page should know how to revert any vandalism that occurs. I cannot see how keeping something no one wants is helpful (no one in this discuss has volunteered to have this moved to his/her userspace; no one has explained how this could be humorous), so I support deletion. Cunard (talk) 08:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cunard, totally useless. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 04:35, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.