Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User 1000

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete, without prejudice to this userbox being userfied, if anyone wants it. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:51, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Template:User 1000


The other three (user 1001 user 2000 user 2001) have already been deleted from this MFD discussion, and as was pointed out there, user contrib already has a deleted contributions function. Also, it's only used by one user, who, according to this, has made exactly 3 deleted contributions. Dynamic&#124;cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 21:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep the other stuff exists argument in reverse. This editor made no substantial reason except other template like this have been deleted before. A tempaltes utility and usefulness to the community does not depend on how many people are using a template. Both arguments are poor. Okip  21:10, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfy. Obscure, near-unused userboxes are not needed in templatespace. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfy to the userspace of anyone willing to take it, per WP:GUS. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:11, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see anyone willing to take it; the creator has already said to keep it (not userfy) above, and the only user of this userbox hasn't edited since May. → Dynamic&#124;cimanyD ← (contact me) 00:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * This is unused. Userfication is not productive, especially given the author's notorious use of userfication to circumvent sensible deletions on ideological grounds. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 21:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, it is used. The one user using it has 3 deleted edits, so "This user has made almost 1000 deleted contributions to Wikipedia" obviously doesn't apply. Dynamic&#124;cimanyD (contact me ⁞ my edits) 22:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Userfying is just sweeping it under the rug and pretending it doesn't exist, especially since a.) there is precedent to delete given the related templates were deleted, and b.) the author apparently being a big fan of sweeping things under the rug by userfying. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.