Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Good Article Interwiki

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 22:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Template:User Good Article Interwiki

 * – (View MfD)

this template created in 2009 is unused and has a very small usage case - probably why it's unused. I propose delete. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Userfy to User:WikiLaurent/User Good Article Interwiki and retain redirect. Neat concept. No prejudice against re-templitification should the author return to more regular activity and wants to make the existence of this template more widely known through documenatation (i.e. advertisement of sorts) at the proper places. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 06:52, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep (relative) disuse is not a reason to delete a userbox that is otherwise in compliance with policy. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 07:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep seems useful enough in the edge case that it's applicable, no reason to delete. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  07:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.