Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User IBADU

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Since the creator doesn't care, no need to userfy. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Template:User IBADU

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Unused since 2008, I think this rather specific template could probably be deleted or userified. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Userfy, for the author, or for User:UBX. Tom (LT), please review WP:ATD, and include in your nominations what ATDs you considered and decided unsuitable, especially for completely innocuous things like this. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete we really don't need this userbox, since we already have two userboxes for University of Dhaka. Catfurball (talk) 16:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * What is the benefit of userfying in this case? The only potential issue is the categorization. userbox categories are frequently large, and removing unused and very unlikely to be used userboxes is a way of making it more usable. I guess Userfy and decategorize? That said, is active. This probably wouldn't be an issue if they just used it on their own userpage. :P &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk \\ 13:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nom. I have no objection to deleting these page.  Arman  ( Talk ) 06:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.