Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Knight Of Carl

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Userfy. to User:Josh Tompkin/User Knight of Carl &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Template:User Knight Of Carl


Template created and only used by an indef-blocked user, rather purposeles Rowan03 (talk) 17:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Userfy. VQuakr (talk) 01:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. What purpose whould userfying serve? Can we please get serious at MfD and stop with the pointless disruptive keep type vots for no purpose. Legacypac (talk) 06:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * "Useless" is a poor reason to delete as discussed at WP:USELESS. There is no reason to delete an old userbox-like template simply because it is lightly used and user page that uses it is indeffed. But since we're here, it probably is better suited for user space than template space given its usage, hence the !vote response. VQuakr (talk) 19:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Userfy. Userboxes are userfied from template space. The account was short lived until blocked as disruptive. However, we don’t just delete blocked users subpages, which would include the userfied userbox. If the account was nothing but disruptive, I suggest blanking the user’s pages. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.