Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Orthodox civilization

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep and move to a subpage of User:UBX. RL0919 (talk) 17:55, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Template:User Orthodox civilization

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Not used, ambiguous, created by a blocked user. Heanor (talk) 13:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Heanor, would you please make effort to avoid implying a misleading timeline. The template was not created by a blocked user.  The template was created by a user who would later be blocked.  And the reasons for the block appear unrelated to this userbox.
 * Your nomination appears related to your RfD at Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_22. You are seeking to clean by deletions uses of “Orthodox civilization”. This term does not seem “ambiguous”. Eg https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-32567-5_2.  Instead, it seems the internal POV of the early Eastern Orthodox Church. Historic POV is not a reason for deletion, but for coverage.
 * Many Userboxes are not used. Not used is not a strong reason for deletion.  Could it be conceivably well used?  If “yes”, I suggest moving to a subpage of User:UBX, per Userboxes. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Agree with you, SmokeyJoe, can you then close this nomination and move to a subpage of User:UBX? --Heanor (talk) 18:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.