Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User OurMed/Bureaucrat

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:User OurMed/Bureaucrat

 * ‑Scottywong | confer _ 22:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * ‑Scottywong | confer _ 22:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Unused userbox for what seems to be a dead website. —⁠andrybak (talk) 19:38, 10 August 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Was used, is used in the history of at least userpage. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:42, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong | confer _ 22:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unused template with no likelihood of being used. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I don’t like deleting old userboxes from old blanked userpages. Old userpages are easily unblanked, and this “no likelihood of being used” even ignoring the past, is not true.  However, on digging, the author was an SPA promoter, and OurMed is a defunct private hospital wiki, so Delete as in old remnant of promotion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:50, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per User:SmokeyJoe. User:SmokeyJoe - Please strike your Keep if that is your intent.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per SmokeyJoe. Promotional material does not belong on Wikipedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 06:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.