Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User USCOTM

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. --BDD (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Template:User USCOTM


Previously submitted to TFD but closed as wrong venue. The USCOTM has been defunct for over a year and even then it didn't really function. Just another failed attempt to get editors to work together. Kumioko (talk) 01:53, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio  Let's talk about it! 13:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, no need to keep around. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - The project seems to have been pretty much completely inactive since late 2011. There's no good reason to keep the infobox around. T  C  N7 JM  01:56, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.