Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User admin Wikicommons

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. As nominator I now see the argument to keep this userbox. (non-admin closure) —Matrix(!) (a good person!)&#91;Citation not needed at all; thank you very much&#93; 20:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Template:User admin Wikicommons

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Redundant to Template:User Commons/Administrator, which also allows users to select a colour, image and image size, plus border colour. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)&#91;Citation not needed at all; thank you very much&#93; 12:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - Allow a user who is a Commons admin to select which of the two userboxes to display on their user page. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Neutral Delete per nom, Note that the nom is a Commons admin. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 13:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - I note that both user boxes are in use. I don't see why somebody with the requisite template skills cannot merge them rather than deleting this template. -- Whpq (talk) 18:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * that's my point: one can just do  —Matrix(!) (a good person!)&#91;Citation not needed at all; thank you very much&#93; 20:09, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Why go through those contortions when one can just type User admin Wikicommons? If you want that to then invoke that set of parameters fine.  But I see no reason to delete this to make it harder to get an infobox a userbox. -- Whpq (talk) 20:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. That a userbox has a variable as opposed to a fixed appearance shouldn't be seen as especially important with regard deleting/merging userboxes. The fact that userbox A *can look the same* as userbox B but userbox's A *default look is not the same* (and requires extra parameters to look the same) does not make A redundant to B. The nominated userbox has more transcluders and is older. Arguably it is the more canonical Wikipedia userbox to denote that someone is a Commons admin, and the other userbox appears to have been copied over from Commons.—Alalch E. 13:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.