Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User css-0




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. harej 00:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Template:User css-0
Transferring nomination incorrectly placed at Templates for discussion/Log/2010 January 24. Userboxes are supposed to be discussed at MFD. Comments already made in the TFD discussion, including the original nomination statement by, are reproduced below. RL0919 (talk) 00:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Meaningless and unnecessary —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:18, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The meaning is quite clear: The user understands that they have no Cascading Style Sheet skills and can admit to it. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 16:24, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Several [language]-0 templates have been deleted for being unencyclopedic. What is the purpose of knowing all of the skills other editors don't have? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Iterating - userboxes are not required to be necessary and meaningful. They can not attack, etc. but I doubt that applies here. Smile. Collect (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Editors matter. "While "it's harmless" is certainly not a valid reason for keeping encyclopedic content (such as articles, templates and images) which does not meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, it is a perfectly valid argument when applied to the Wikipedia namespace and to userspace." -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 13:56, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - it is not useful to know that an editor has no CSS skills. I don't see how the essay Editors matter applies in this case: we are considering deletion of a technical template, not a user page, user subpage, or even a favorite userbox. I don't believe that any of the users who use this template will be made unhappy (or even care or notice) if the template is deleted or removed. –Black Falcon (talk) 18:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.